The number of misrepresentations that have occurred in this campaign (on both sides) is truly distressing. We live in a society that favors soundbites rather than substance. Politicians master the art of spin, and we are all worse off as a result, because there can be no true battle of ideas if those ideas are not accurately presented to the public. If more Americans started visiting Factcheck.org regularly, politicians might have to start representing the facts more accurately.
Last semester I took a seminar taught by Dr. Bruce Ware on the doctrine of providence. We studied the whole spectrum of views of God’s relationship to the world: process theism, open theism, classical Arminianism, Molinism, Calvinism, and modified forms of Calvinism. Dr. Ware is a modified Calvinist, and he has written in opposition to other views, specifically subjecting open theism to a thorough critique. But I was impressed throughout the course of this seminar at how hard he worked to ensure that we accurately understood the claims made by all sides. If we were discussing the weaknesses of another position in class, and we made unguarded statements that misrepresented open theism (or Arminianism, etc.), then Dr. Ware would call us on it. He would ask us if the proponents of that view would be happy with the way we had represented them. It is only when you can answer that question affirmatively that you are then in a position to offer a credible response.
Critiquing a view that nobody holds not only is unhelpful, it is also unethical. No matter how much we disagree with someone else, we always owe that person the respect of letting his or her voice be heard on its own terms. If we filter everything through our own spin machine, we suppress otherness, disrespect a person made in God’s image, and fail to make any true progress for our own positions. I only wish the game of politics didn’t work in precisely this way. It will only happen as long as we, the public, allow it to happen.
